NY Marriage Equality: a tale of two bishops

Do you remember the prompts from school writing assignments, asking you to "compare and contrast"?  Here's one for you.  As a vote for marriage equality comes up in the New York State House, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of New York and the Episcopal Bishop of Long Island have both put out statements.

For those unfamiliar with these two faith traditions, they are extremely similar in both liturgy and doctrine.  A Roman Catholic attending an Episcopal service will find only a handful of words changed in the Mass.  Some people have referred to Episcopalians as "modern Catholics" since they ordain married priests, women priests, and openly gay-and-partnered priests (and bishops).  Like most every Christian denomination they have struggled with issues associated with sexuality, but in many Episcopal dioceses gay couples can be blessed or even married and the church is moving forward on this issue.

So with that said, compare and contrast these two:

The Roman Catholic Archbishop of New York, Timothy Dolan, manages to offend nearly everyoneas he writes in his blog ,

we are living in New York, in the United States of America – not in China or North Korea.  In those countries, government presumes daily to “redefine” rights, relationships, values, and natural law.  There, communiqués from the government can dictate the size of families, who lives and who dies, and what the very definition of “family” and “marriage” means.

But, please, not here!  Our country’s founding principles speak of rights given by God, not invented by government, and certain noble values – life, home, family, marriage, children, faith – that are protected, not re-defined, by a state presuming omnipotence.

Please, not here!  We cherish true freedom, not as the license to do whatever we want, but the liberty to do what we ought; we acknowledge that not every desire, urge, want, or chic cause is automatically a “right.”  And, what about other rights, like that of a child to be raised in a family with a mom and a dad?

Our beliefs should not be viewed as discrimination against homosexual people. …

Well, Archbishop, us homosexual people sure perceive it that way, as you attack our families.

Yes, I admit, I come at this as a believer, who, along with other citizens of a diversity of creeds believe that God, not Albany, has settled the definition of marriage a long time ago.  We believers worry not only about what this new intrusion will do to our common good, but also that we will be coerced to violate our deepest beliefs to accommodate the newest state decree.  (If you think this paranoia, just ask believers in Canada and England what’s going on there to justify our apprehensions.)

Note how Archbishop Dolan presumes to speak for all believers.  In a previous entry, he even brought up the Slippery Slope argument, waving the flag of fear by saying, If the definition of marriage is continually being altered, could it not in the future be morphed again to include multiple spouses or even family members?

How different is the tone from the Episcopal Bishop of Long Island, Larry Provenzano, who writes,

Our faith traditions teach us that all people are children of God, deserving of love, dignity and equal treatment, and we, the undersigned therefore believe that gay and lesbian New Yorkers in committed, loving relationships should be able to protect each other with the critical safety-net provided by civil marriage. The performing of marriage ceremonies is one of the most important facets of our work as ministers and rabbis. We take this work extremely seriously and are grateful to have “the power vested in us” by the State of New York as we bring couples together in marriage through our civil and religious laws.

While we recognize and respect that not all faiths support marriage equality, it is important to note that the legislation in its current form states that no clergy, house of worship or denomination would be forced to perform same-sex marriages. Moreover, current New York State law already provides extremely broad protections for religious organizations that do not wish to make their facilities available to same-sex couples for marriage ceremonies, receptions or other functions. Those protections would be unchanged under the proposed legislation.

It would be a blessing if New York were to allow loving, committed gay and lesbian couples to be married. We call on the Legislature to pass this legislation for the good of these couples and for the good of our great State.

Good for you, Bishop.

Now students, both of these men describe themselves as men of God.  Now write your essay.  And please try not to bash religion for its own sake, okay?  This essay shows you that "religion" is not of one mind.